Hysteresis vs. natural rate of US unemployment
Ka Ming Cheng (),
Nazif Durmaz (),
Hyeongwoo Kim () and
Michael Stern ()
Economic Modelling, 2012, vol. 29, issue 2, 428-434
This paper investigates the stochastic nature of the unemployment rate allowing for cross-section dependence from a panel of US state-level data. We first employ the PANIC method to identify the common and idiosyncratic components. Powerful recursive mean adjustment (RMA) methods are used to test for unit roots. We find significant evidence of a nonstationary common component when the data from the most recent recession are included. Even when stationarity is empirically supported, the bias-corrected half-life of the common component appears very long, casting doubt on the usefulness of the natural rate hypothesis.
Keywords: Unemployment rate; Natural rate hypothesis; Hysteresis; PANIC; RMA; Cross-section dependence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C23 J64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (33) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Hysteresis vs. Natural Rate of US Unemployment (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:29:y:2012:i:2:p:428-434
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Modelling is currently edited by S. Hall and P. Pauly
More articles in Economic Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().