Migration and FDI: Reconciling the standard trade theory with empirical evidence

Hubert Jayet and Léa Marchal ()

Economic Modelling, 2016, vol. 59, issue C, 46-66

Abstract: This article focuses on an apparent conflict between the standard trade theory and available empirical evidence on factor flows. Theoretically, labor and capital flows must be substitutes. However, empirical papers find migration and FDI to be either substitutes or complements, depending upon the skill content of migration. To reconcile the standard theory with these empirical results, we develop a two-country general equilibrium model. We consider three factors – capital, unskilled and skilled labor – and two internationally traded goods. Countries only differ in their factor endowments. The first country is a developing country amply endowed with unskilled labor; the second one is a developed country well endowed with skilled labor. Under imperfect factor mobility, we find that capital and unskilled labor flows are substitutes, while capital and skilled labor flows are complements.

Keywords: Capital flows; Migration; Skills; Standard trade theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999316301821
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Migration and FDI: Reconciling the standard trade theory with empirical evidence (2016)
Working Paper: Migration and FDI: Reconciling the standard trade theory with empirical evidence (2016)
Working Paper: Migration and FDI: Reconciling the standard trade theory with empirical evidence (2016)
Working Paper: Migration and FDI: Reconciling the standard trade theory with empirical evidence (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:59:y:2016:i:c:p:46-66

DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.06.019

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Modelling is currently edited by S. Hall and P. Pauly

More articles in Economic Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().