Welfare effects of TTIP in a DSGE model
Philipp Engler and
Juha Tervala
Economic Modelling, 2018, vol. 70, issue C, 230-238
Abstract:
We analyze the welfare effects of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the United States (US) and the European Union (EU). Earlier TTIP studies analyze welfare effects in a framework where output and welfare coincide. We believe that the utility function of households, which depends on consumption and employment, is the best criterion for assessing TTIP. We measure the welfare effect of TTIP as the percentage of consumption that households would be willing to pay for TTIP in order to remain as well off with it as without it. The welfare effects of TTIP, which eliminates tariffs and cuts non-tariff measures, are always positive for the US and the EU. The reason is that the welfare gain of higher consumption more than offsets the welfare loss of a change in employment. The policy implication is that the US and the EU should continue the negotiations for the TTIP agreement.
Keywords: Tariffs; TTIP; Trade agreement; Trade liberalization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E60 F13 F41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999317309264
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Welfare Effects of TTIP in a DSGE Model (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:70:y:2018:i:c:p:230-238
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.11.007
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Modelling is currently edited by S. Hall and P. Pauly
More articles in Economic Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().