Structural reforms in DSGE models: Output gains but welfare losses
Benoît Campagne () and
Economic Modelling, 2018, vol. 75, issue C, 397-421
In a standard DSGE model of the Euro Area, we shed new light on a popular exercise: pro-competitive reforms evaluation. The simple redefinition of households' utility function can lead to additional gains or losses of a few percentage points in output following such reforms. In addition, policy recommendations from welfare analysis are less clear-cut than those solely based on output gains. Both in the short and in the long run, structural reforms, although unambiguously output-enhancing, can prove detrimental to welfare. In addition, we show that goods market reforms reduce inequalities while labour market reforms are neutral. All in all, our results advocate for the extensive use of sensitivity analyses for quantitative policy purposes.
Keywords: Structural reform; DSGE model; Markup; Sensitivity; Welfare (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E10 E60 E20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Structural reforms in DSGE models: a case for sensitivity analyses (2016)
Working Paper: Structural Reforms in DSGE Models: A Plead for Sensitivity Analysis (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:75:y:2018:i:c:p:397-421
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Modelling is currently edited by S. Hall and P. Pauly
More articles in Economic Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().