Which is the best: A comparison of asset pricing factor models in Chinese mutual fund industry
Yezhou Sha and
Economic Modelling, 2019, vol. 83, issue C, 8-16
Factor models are commonly used in estimating risk-adjusted fund performance. We compare the commonly used factor models in empirical asset pricing studies and find that Fama and French (2015) five-factor model outperforms other models in the Chinese mutual fund industry and in most fund segments. The factor models we tested are more effective in explaining the return of index funds than other types. Meanwhile, we also find that the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) better controls the estimated alpha dispersion than other models. Though most multifactor models including Carhart (1997) have higher R-squared than CAPM, the cross-sectional differences between them are not statistically significant.
Keywords: Asset pricing; Mutual fund; China; Factor model; Non-nested model comparison (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 G23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:83:y:2019:i:c:p:8-16
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Modelling is currently edited by S. Hall and P. Pauly
More articles in Economic Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().