Historical financial analogies of the current crisis

Julián Andrada-Félix, Fernando Fernández-Rodríguez and Simon Sosvilla-Rivero

Economics Letters, 2012, vol. 116, issue 2, 190-192

Abstract: This paper tries to shed light on the historical analogies of the current crisis. To that end we compare the current sample distribution of Dow Jones Industrial Average Index returns for a 769-day period (from 15 September 2008, the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, to 30 September 2011), with all historical sample distributions of returns computed using a moving window of 769 days in the 2 January 1900 to 12 September 2008 period. Using a χ2 homogeneity test, we find that the stock market returns distribution during the current crisis would be similar to several past periods of severe financial crises that evolved into intense recessions, being the sub-sample from 22 September 1937 to 16 October 1940 the most analogous episode to the current situation. Furthermore, when applying the procedure proposed by Diebold et al. (1998) for comparing densities of sub-samples, we obtain additional support for our findings and discover a period from 18 September 1930 to 23 October 1933 where the severity of the crisis overcome the current situation having sharper tail events. Finally, when comparing historical market risk with the current risk, we observe that the current market risk has only been exceeded in the beginning of the Great Depression.

Keywords: Financial crisis; Great recession; Great depression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C12 E3 G1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176512000559
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Historical financial analogies of the current crisis (2011)
Working Paper: Historical financial analogies of the current crisis (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:116:y:2012:i:2:p:190-192

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.02.015

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().