 Bias in estimating returns to tenure: The impact of monopsony powerAndy Snell, Jonathan P. Thomas and Pedro Martins Economics Letters, 2025, vol. 247, issue C Abstract: This note revisits the bias in returns to tenure estimates (RTT) that arises when firm employment and wages comove through firm-specific (FS) wage shocks — shocks to wages that likely occur in the presence of monopsony power(MP). In an earlier paper, Snell et al. (2018), found that adding firm-year fixed effects to a Mincer regression for workers in a small sample of firms in German and Portuguese panel data raised the estimated RTT schedules by about 30%. Here we re-examine the sign and magnitude of this bias using the universe of workers in Portugal. We find the bias remains negative and large. We then split the data into low and high labour market concentration firms to examine the role MP plays in these results. We find that the RTT bias arising from FS wage shocks is larger in firms with high MP than low MP. The results reinforce the need to control for FS wage shocks in RTT estimation exercises especially where comparisons across different workers in different firms are made. Keywords: Equal treatment; Returns to tenure; Returns to seniority (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:247:y:2025:i:c:s0165176524005895 DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2024.112105 Access Statistics for this article Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.