A comparison of two lower trophic models for the California Current System

Thomas C. Wainwright, Leah R. Feinberg, Rian C. Hooff and William T. Peterson

Ecological Modelling, 2007, vol. 202, issue 1, 120-131

Abstract: Both simple and more complex lower trophic ecosystem models were applied to the near shore pelagic zone of the California Current System. The ecosystem models were a simple nitrogen–phytoplankton–zooplankton (NPZ) model derived from that of Edwards et al. (J. Mar. Res. 58, 37–60, 2000), and a modified version of the more complex PICES North Pacific Ecosystem Model for Understanding Regional Oceanography (NEMURO), which includes both nitrogen and silicate cycles, as well as multiple phytoplankton and zooplankton components. These models were framed within two simplified physics models, similar to those constructed by Newberger et al. (J. Geophys. Res. 108 (3), 3061, doi:10.1029/2001JC001182, 2003). The first physics model was a zero-dimensional closed system, used for structural analysis of the biological models. The second was a one-dimensional (horizontal, with no vertical structure) cross-shelf model of the mixed layer, used to examine the biological response to upwelling. The predictions of the two biological models within the one-dimensional physical framework were compared with observed nutrients, chlorophyll, and zooplankton on the Newport Hydrographic Line. Equilibrium behavior of the zero-dimensional models was similar to that in previous studies; differences between the models resulted primarily from differences in the density dependence of mortality. Both models were found to be highly sensitive to the same four parameters: source nitrate concentration, maximum grazing rate, zooplankton Ivlev constant, and zooplankton mortality rate. In the cross-shelf case, both biological models had a similar timing of phytoplankton response to upwelling, but maximum phytoplankton concentration and zooplankton dynamics differed, with the simpler NPZ model resulting in lower dissolved nutrients but higher plankton densities than the modified NEMURO model. While the modified NEMURO model provided a slightly better overall fit to observations, neither model was able to fully capture observed phytoplankton and zooplankton dynamics.

Keywords: California Current; Ecosystem model; Biophysical model; Plankton; Upwelling; Ocean production; NEMURO (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380006004613
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:202:y:2007:i:1:p:120-131

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.06.019

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Modelling is currently edited by Brian D. Fath

More articles in Ecological Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().