Comparison of stepwise selection and Bayesian model averaging for yield gap analysis

Lorène Prost, David Makowski and Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy

Ecological Modelling, 2008, vol. 219, issue 1, 66-76

Abstract: Stepwise selection is frequently used in ecology and agronomy. In the yield gap analysis approach, linear regression and stepwise selection are used to identify and rank the limiting factors of crop yield. The main value of stepwise selection is that it can be used to select a subset of explanatory variables by using statistical criteria. The number of parameters in the final model obtained by using such a procedure is expected to be less than in the complete model, and the variance of the estimated parameters can be reduced. Nonetheless, several recent studies have emphasized the limitations of stepwise selection, such as the lack of stability of the set of selected variables and bias in the parameter estimates. Model mixing methods like Bayesian model averaging (BMA) have been proposed as an alternative, but these methods have never been used for yield gap analysis. The objective of this paper was to compare stepwise selection methods and BMA for yield gap analysis. Our comparison was based on 10000 bootstrap samples drawn from a dataset of 160 plots including 8 years of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) experiments. Parameter estimates obtained after stepwise selection were compared to the estimated values obtained without any selection and to the estimated values obtained with BMA. The results showed that these statistical methods led to contrasted frequencies of variables selections and to different estimated parameter values. The frequencies of selection were greater with BMA than with stepwise selection. BMA also gave smaller standard deviations for parameter estimates in many cases, but this was not always the case. Compared to the stepwise selection methods, the parameter estimates obtained with BMA were closer to zero. Our results showed that the bootstrap approach can efficiently allow agronomists to compare various statistical methods for selecting explanatory variables and for estimating the effects of limiting factors.

Keywords: Bootstrap; Diagnosis; Limiting factor; Model mixing; Model selection; Stepwise; Parameter estimation; Wheat (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380008003815
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:219:y:2008:i:1:p:66-76

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.026

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Modelling is currently edited by Brian D. Fath

More articles in Ecological Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().