EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Modelling evapotranspiration in a Central Asian desert ecosystem

L. Li, G. Luo, X. Chen, Y. Li, G. Xu, H. Xu and J. Bai

Ecological Modelling, 2011, vol. 222, issue 20, 3680-3691

Abstract: In current terrestrial ecosystem modelling used by hydrological and biochemical cycle researchers, arid and semiarid biomes should receive much more attention because they cover a large proportion of total land area. Limited understanding of ecophysiological parameters of desert shrubs makes it very difficult to estimate evapotranspiration with ecosystem models over Central Asia. This research determined two important parameters, the initial quantum efficiency (α) and the maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax), required in the current widely used modelling strategies for two desert shrubs (Haloxylon ammodendron and Tamarix ramosissima). The photosynthetic parameters were applied to a coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration to simulate the diurnal dynamics of transpiration and seasonal patterns of evapotranspiration and soil evaporation. The stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, and transpiration models were adopted from Ball–Berry, Farquhar (for C3), Collatz (for C4), and Shuttleworth–Wallace as commonly parameterised in most current terrestrial ecosystem models. It was found that the Shuttleworth–Wallace model was able to explain 61% and 52% of the variances of the measured transpiration for T. ramosissima and H. ammodendron respectively. In addition, the model explained 78% and 57% of the variances of the observed total evapotranspiration and soil evaporation for a desert ecosystem where T. ramosissima is sparsely distributed. This result suggests that the Shuttleworth–Wallace model implemented with a coupled photosynthesis–stomatal conductance–transpiration modelling strategy is a promising approach for estimating evapotranspiration in desert ecosystems over Central Asia. In contrast, a very simple format of evapotranspiration modelling approach, the Priestley–Taylor model, was only able to yield a fair estimation of evapotranspiration during some periods of the growing season even though the soil moisture effect is integrated into the Priestley–Taylor parameter. We recommend that the physically based Shuttleworth–Wallace model be used for estimating evapotranspiration in related ecohydrological research in desert ecosystems over Central Asia.

Keywords: Maximum carboxylation rate; Evapotranspiration; Shuttleworth–Wallace model; Priestley–Taylor model; Desert shrubs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380011004601
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:20:p:3680-3691

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.002

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Modelling is currently edited by Brian D. Fath

More articles in Ecological Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:222:y:2011:i:20:p:3680-3691