Exploring the effects of spatial closures in a temperate marine ecosystem in Western Australia: A case study of the western rock lobster (Panulirus cygnus) fishery

Hector M. Lozano-Montes, Russ Babcock and Neil R. Loneragan

Ecological Modelling, 2012, vol. 245, issue C, 31-40

Abstract: An Ecospace model, was developed to investigate the potential impacts of spatial closures on key species and the food webs in the Jurien Bay Marine Park (JBMP), central Western Australia (823km2). The model comprised 80 functional groups (more than 200 species). The JBMP is a multiple use-marine park with several types of zoning and the effects of these on rock lobster biomass, mortalities and landings were explored using five Ecospace scenarios as baselines: (1) no-take Sanctuary Zones covering 4% of the total area; area of Sanctuary Zones changed to (2) 25%, (3) 50%; (4) 0%, i.e. No Sanctuary Zones; and (5) combining 25% of no-take areas with a 50% reduction in fishing mortality of the main targeted species. The results suggest that the introduction of the current management zones with 4% of the area in Sanctuary Zones produced a modest increase of ∼5% in the biomass of western rock lobster after 20 years, even with stable fishing effort. However, Western Rock Lobster biomass increased by ∼20% when the Sanctuary Zones covered 25% of the Park. Similar trends were observed for exploited fish species such as pink snapper, dhufish, and small sharks with their biomasses predicted to increase by up to 30% as the area of sanctuary zones increase from 4% to 50%. The largest predicted increases in biomass for the main target species were found when the protection from the sanctuaries (25%) was combined with a 50% reduction of fishing pressure. The catch of finfish species improved up to 70% (e.g. pink snapper) when a 25% of no-take area simulated was combined with a 50% reduction of fishing mortality during 20 years. To test the effects of habitat structure on the effectiveness of these fishing closures, a set of four scenarios were developed. We relocated the current 4% of sanctuaries, which are mainly associated with a reef-seagrass habitat, to the other three major habitats (reefs, seagrass and sand). The predicted fish biomass was higher when sanctuaries were placed on high structured habitats, such as reefs and seagrass-reefs (10–90%) than seagrass and sandy areas.

Keywords: Ecosystem model; Ecospace; Marine protected area; Sanctuary zones; Fishing impact; Western rock lobster (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380012002360
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:245:y:2012:i:c:p:31-40

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.05.015

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Modelling is currently edited by Brian D. Fath

More articles in Ecological Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().