Sensitivity analysis using Morris: Just screening or an effective ranking method?

Livia Paleari, Ermes Movedi, Michele Zoli, Andrea Burato, Irene Cecconi, Jabir Errahouly, Eleonora Pecollo, Carla Sorvillo and Roberto Confalonieri

Ecological Modelling, 2021, vol. 455, issue C

Abstract: Sensitivity analysis (SA) is a fundamental practice for analyzing model behavior under different conditions of application. A number of SA techniques were proposed, ranging from simple screening methods to computationally expensive variance-based ones. In this study, we compared the Morris and E-FAST methods by applying them to three widely used generic crop models largely differing for complexity and for the approaches used to formalize knowledge on crop physiology, i.e., STICS, CropSyst and WOFOST. SA experiments were carried out at sub-model level on rice crops grown under different environmental conditions. Results highlighted the lack of linearity between the total-order sensitivity estimates provided by E-FAST and Morris, although the concordance (TDCC) between the parameter rankings obtained with the two methods was always significant at the 0.05 level for parameters involved with crop growth and for those involved with phenological development for STICS, whereas it was significant at the 0.10 level for the phenology parameters of CropSyst and WOFOST. Given Morris required less than 3% of the model executions needed by E-FAST, our results allow considering Morris as a suitable alternative to more demanding SA methods when ranking parameters or discriminating between influential and non-influential model factors are the SA goals, especially in computationally expensive SA studies.

Keywords: Crop model; CropSyst; E-FAST; Fourier amplitude sensitivity test; STICS; WOFOST (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380021002088
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:455:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021002088

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109648

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Modelling is currently edited by Brian D. Fath

More articles in Ecological Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().