Modeling Potential production and yield gap of potato using modelling and GIS approaches

Amir Dadrasi, Benjamin Torabi, Asghar Rahimi, Afshin Soltani and Ebrahim Zeinali

Ecological Modelling, 2022, vol. 471, issue C

Abstract: Understanding yield potential (Yp) and yield gap (Yg) in current intensive potato (solanum tuberosum L.) production is essential to meet future food demand with the limited resources. Evaluating yield gap is a strong approach to estimate maximum production potential when all factors are in the best condition. A complete estimation of yield gap and potential yield across all major potato producing regions in Iran is lacking. The global yield gap atlas (GYGA) protocol was used to estimate potential yield of potato in Iran. This protocol is based on the climatic zones (CZs) and the reference weather stations (RWS) buffer zones, soil types in each buffer zone. Thirty-five RWS buffer zones in potato producing regions were selected, and total potato area in the RWS buffer zones covered 83% of the whole potato harvest area. According to the results, the average Yp was 67.3 t ha–1 and actual yield (Ya) was 30 t ha–1. Therefore, the average tuber yield gap was 37.3 t ha–1. These results indicate that the Potato producers achieved 45% of the potential yield in Iran. Iranian farmers produced 5 million tons of potato from about 164,000 ha. If they can obtain only 80% of Yp (53.8 t ha–1), amount of potato production will be 8.8 million tones. As result, they can produce 5.2 million tons tuber yield of potato in 97,000 ha cultivation area. Thus, with closing yield gap and increasing potato production, it is possible to decrease potato lands.

Keywords: Actual yield; Harvest area map; Environmental factors; Potential yield (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022001600
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:471:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022001600

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110050

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Modelling is currently edited by Brian D. Fath

More articles in Ecological Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().