Background selection complexity influences Maxent predictive performance in freshwater systems

Tyler E. Schartel and Yong Cao

Ecological Modelling, 2024, vol. 488, issue C

Abstract: Absence data are often lacking for species distribution modeling (SDM) purposes. This necessitates selecting background or pseudo-absence observations that influence SDM performance. Little is understood about how background selection affects SDM prediction in lotic systems. Here we test six background selection methods that implement different combinations of three selection filters concerning 1) sampling biases in species occurrence data, 2) geographic restriction to regions accessible to the species modeled, and 3) species occurrence relative to stream size, a key habitat factor. These six methods are used with Maxent to develop binary presence-absence predictions of 71 freshwater mussel distributions in the Midwestern United States. Prediction accuracy was evaluated with a separate validation presence-absence dataset derived from intensive surveys. Pairwise comparisons of background selection methods across species recorded in the validation dataset revealed significant differences relative to the Area Under Curve (AUC), the similarity between the prediction and observation, and the True Skill Statistic (TSS) metrics. The prediction specificity for those species absent in the validation dataset was also significantly affected by the background selection method. Implementing the sampling bias filter increased prediction similarity with validation data, AUC and TSS for species with validation presences, as well as prediction specificity for species without validation presences. Our results provide much needed insight into how background selection influences presence-background SDM performance in lotic systems. These findings can guide how to leverage available data and biological understanding to produce accurate SDM predictions that prioritize research objectives and goals regardless of study system or habitat.

Keywords: Background selection; Species distribution models; Lotic; Freshwater mussels (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380023003228
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:488:y:2024:i:c:s0304380023003228

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110592

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Modelling is currently edited by Brian D. Fath

More articles in Ecological Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().