EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Improved forest canopy evaporation leads to better predictions of ecohydrological processes

Henrique Haas, Latif Kalin and Haw Yen

Ecological Modelling, 2024, vol. 489, issue C

Abstract: Canopy evaporation (Ei) is a vital process in forest ecosystems impacting hydrology and biogeochemistry through the redistribution of gross rainfall and gradual infiltration of water into the soil profile. Inaccurate representation of Ei in models may lead to flawed predictions of ecohydrological processes such as water availability, soil erosion, nutrient transport, and ecosystem productivity, thus compromising the reliability of model outputs. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) ecohydrological model has been widely used for various purposes worldwide. However, SWAT has shown limitations in forest ecosystems. SWAT employs a single equation to calculate canopy evaporation for crops and trees, which may not accurately account for the differences in ecophysiology and aerodynamic resistance between short and tall vegetation. In SWAT, canopy interception is calculated as a function of canopy storage and is normalized by the maximum plant leaf area index (LAI). Here we present an alternative approach to simulate forest canopy interception and evaporation with SWAT. Under our proposed approach, the LAI normalization is eliminated, and canopy storage is computed as a linear function of daily LAI and a user-defined parameter. We used remote-sensing (R-S) estimates of Ei to accurately parameterize forest canopy evaporation in the modified and default models. The Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa, a large (55,000 km2) and forested watershed system in the Southeast United States, is utilized as testbed. Results showed that the default SWAT largely underestimated (> 70%) forest Ei across our study domain. The modified model better matched R-S estimates of Ei, showing a mere 2% overestimation. Additionally, the modified model yielded better agreement with R-S transpiration and total evapotranspiration compared to the default model. Our alternative approach positively affected the model simulation of daily streamflow and ecologically relevant flow metrics, reducing model overestimations and leading to better agreement with observations. Also, the modified model led to reduced sediment, nitrate, and organic nitrogen loadings, with sediment and organic nitrogen being particularly affected, witnessing reductions of 13 and 11%, respectively, compared to the default model. Finally, our proposed approach resonated in better agreement between simulated net primary productivity (NPP) and R-S estimates. Although our study is in the context of SWAT, our findings can be useful to the broader modeling community since other popular process-based models are based on similar modeling assumptions. Our findings demonstrate the benefits of improved forest evapotranspiration partitioning for simulating ecological processes with SWAT.

Keywords: Canopy evaporation; forest modelling; ecosystem services; SWAT; remote sensing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024000097
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:489:y:2024:i:c:s0304380024000097

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110620

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Modelling is currently edited by Brian D. Fath

More articles in Ecological Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:489:y:2024:i:c:s0304380024000097