Structural vs. atheoretic approaches to econometrics
Michael Keane ()
Journal of Econometrics, 2010, vol. 156, issue 1, 3-20
In this paper I attempt to lay out the sources of conflict between the so-called "structural" and "experimentalist" camps in econometrics. Critics of the structural approach often assert that it produces results that rely on too many assumptions to be credible, and that the experimentalist approach provides an alternative that relies on fewer assumptions. Here, I argue that this is a false dichotomy. All econometric work relies heavily on a priori assumptions. The main difference between structural and experimental (or "atheoretic") approaches is not in the number of assumptions but the extent to which they are made explicit.
Keywords: Structural; models; Natural; experiments; Dynamic; models; Life-cycle; models; Instrumental; variables (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (113) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:econom:v:156:y:2010:i:1:p:3-20
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Econometrics is currently edited by T. Amemiya, A. R. Gallant, J. F. Geweke, C. Hsiao and P. M. Robinson
More articles in Journal of Econometrics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().