EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparison of misspecified calibrated models: The minimum distance approach

Viktoria Hnatkovska (), Vadim Marmer () and Yao Tang ()

Journal of Econometrics, 2012, vol. 169, issue 1, 131-138

Abstract: This paper proposes several testing procedures for comparison of misspecified calibrated models. The proposed tests are of the Vuong-type (Vuong, 1989; Rivers and Vuong, 2002). In our framework, the econometrician selects values for model’s parameters in order to match some characteristics of data with those implied by the theoretical model. We assume that all competing models are misspecified, and suggest a test for the null hypothesis that they provide equivalent fit to data characteristics, against the alternative that one of the models is a better approximation. We consider both nested and non-nested cases. We also relax the dependence of models’ ranking on the choice of a weight matrix by suggesting averaged and sup-norm procedures. The methods are illustrated by comparing the cash-in-advance and portfolio adjustment cost models in their ability to match the impulse responses of output and inflation to money growth shocks.

Keywords: Misspecified models; Calibration; Minimum distance estimation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C51 C52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407612000085
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Comparison of Misspecified Calibrated Models: The Minimum Distance Approach (2011) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:econom:v:169:y:2012:i:1:p:131-138

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Econometrics is currently edited by T. Amemiya, A. R. Gallant, J. F. Geweke, C. Hsiao and P. M. Robinson

More articles in Journal of Econometrics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

 
Page updated 2019-08-12
Handle: RePEc:eee:econom:v:169:y:2012:i:1:p:131-138