Identification versus misspecification in New Keynesian monetary policy models
Stefan Laséen (),
Jesper Lindé and
European Economic Review, 2019, vol. 113, issue C, 225-246
In this paper, we study identification and misspecification problems in standard closed and open-economy empirical New-Keynesian DSGE models used in monetary policy analysis. We find that problems with model misspecification still appear to be a first-order issue in monetary DSGE models, and argue that it is problems with model misspecification that may benefit the most from moving from a classical to a Bayesian framework. We also argue that lack of identification should neither be ignored nor be assumed to affect all DSGE models. Fortunately, identification problems can be readily assessed on a case-by-case basis, by applying recently developed pre-tests of identification.
Keywords: Bayesian estimation; Monte-Carlo methods; Maximum likelihood estimation; DSGE Model; Closed economy; Open economy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C13 C51 E30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Identification Versus Misspecification in New Keynesian Monetary Policy Models (2019)
Working Paper: Identification Versus Misspecification in New Keynesian Monetary Policy Models (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:113:y:2019:i:c:p:225-246
Access Statistics for this article
European Economic Review is currently edited by T.S. Eicher, A. Imrohoroglu, E. Leeper, J. Oechssler and M. Pesendorfer
More articles in European Economic Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().