Are patient-regarding preferences stable? Evidence from a laboratory experiment with physicians and medical students from different countries
Tor Iversen (),
Heike Hennig-Schmidt and
Geir Godager ()
European Economic Review, 2020, vol. 125, issue C
We quantify patient-regarding preferences by fitting a bounded rationality model to data from an incentivized laboratory experiment, where Chinese medical doctors, German medical students and Chinese medical students decide under different payment schemes. We find a remarkable stability in patient-regarding preferences when comparing subject pools and we cannot reject the hypothesis of equal patient-regarding preferences in the three groups. The results suggest that a health economic experiment can provide knowledge that reach beyond the student subject pool, and that the preferences of decision-makers in one cultural context can be of relevance in a very different cultural context.
Keywords: Laboratory experiment; Bounded rationality; Payment mechanism; Physician behavior (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 D82 I11 H40 J33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Are patient-regarding preferences stable? Evidence from a laboratory experiment with physicians and medical students from different countries (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:125:y:2020:i:c:s001429212030043x
Access Statistics for this article
European Economic Review is currently edited by T.S. Eicher, A. Imrohoroglu, E. Leeper, J. Oechssler and M. Pesendorfer
More articles in European Economic Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().