EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Testing rational hypotheses in signaling games

Adam Dominiak and Dongwoo Lee

European Economic Review, 2023, vol. 160, issue C

Abstract: We introduce a solution concept for signaling games, called Rational Hypothesis Testing Equilibrium (RHTE). Beliefs are updated via Ortoleva’s (2012) Hypothesis Testing model, allowing for conditioning on information sets off the path. Hypotheses are conjectures by the uninformed player about opponent’s strategies that rationalize sending an unexpected message. Each RHTE is a Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium, but not vice versa. RHTE features a number of desirable properties: First, beliefs are structurally consistent in the spirit of Kreps and Wilson (1982). Second, beliefs are consistent with mutual knowledge of rationality. Third, RHTE can be related to the prominent refinement concepts, including the Intuitive Criterion, strategic stability, and undefeated equilibrium. In the Spence game, RHTE restricts the admissible wages, significantly reducing the number of equilibria. Finally, we show that our equilibrium notion offers an alternative explanation for the experimental results in Brandts and Holt (1992, 1993).

Keywords: Signaling games; Perfect Bayesian equilibrium; Updating; Off-path beliefs; Hypothesis testing; Rationality; Refinements; Intuitive Criterion; Strategic stability; Undefeated equilibrium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C73 D81 D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292123002386
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:160:y:2023:i:c:s0014292123002386

DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104610

Access Statistics for this article

European Economic Review is currently edited by T.S. Eicher, A. Imrohoroglu, E. Leeper, J. Oechssler and M. Pesendorfer

More articles in European Economic Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-12
Handle: RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:160:y:2023:i:c:s0014292123002386