Optimal redistribution with unobservable disability: Welfarist versus non-welfarist social objectives
Pierre Pestieau and
Maria Racionero
European Economic Review, 2009, vol. 53, issue 6, 636-644
Abstract:
This paper examines the optimal non-linear income and commodity tax when the same labor disutility can receive two alternative interpretations, taste for leisure or disability, but the disability is not readily observable. We compare the optimal policy under alternative social objectives, welfarist and non-welfarist, and conclude that the non-welfarist objective, in which the planner gives a higher weight to the disutility of labor of the disabled individuals, is the only reasonable specification. It has some foundation in the theory of responsibility; further, unlike the other specifications it yields an optimal solution that may involve a lower labor supply requirement from disabled individuals.
Keywords: Optimal; non-linear; taxation; Quasi-linear; preferences; Asymmetric; information; Responsibility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014-2921(08)00117-7
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Optimal redistribution with unobservable disability: welfarist versus non-welfarist social objectives (2009)
Working Paper: Optimal redistribution with unobservable disability: Welfarist versus non-welfarist social objectives (2009)
Working Paper: Optimal redistribution with unobservable disability: Welfarist versus non-welfarist social objectives (2009)
Working Paper: Optimal redistribution with unobservable disability: welfarist versus non-welfarist social objectives (2007) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:53:y:2009:i:6:p:636-644
Access Statistics for this article
European Economic Review is currently edited by T.S. Eicher, A. Imrohoroglu, E. Leeper, J. Oechssler and M. Pesendorfer
More articles in European Economic Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().