Is bioenergy trade good for the environment?
Jean-Marc Bourgeon and
Hélène Ollivier
European Economic Review, 2012, vol. 56, issue 3, 411-421
Abstract:
We analyze the impacts of bioenergy trade on greenhouse gas emissions using a two-good, three-factor model. Bioenergy is an agricultural good used as a substitute for fossil fuels in industry. Governments tax domestic pollution without international coordination. We assume that northern countries have higher labor productivity than southern ones and that agriculture is less pollution intensive than industry (after taxation). We show that whereas southern countries impose a lower tax rate than northern ones, they do not necessary have a competitive advantage in industry, and that compared to autarky, trade liberalization either increases or decreases worldwide emissions depending on regional comparative advantages.
Keywords: Bioenergy; Intermediate product; North–South trade; Global pollution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F18 H23 Q17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292111001097
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Is bioenergy trade good for the environment? (2012) 
Working Paper: Is bioenergy trade good for the environment? (2012) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:56:y:2012:i:3:p:411-421
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2011.11.002
Access Statistics for this article
European Economic Review is currently edited by T.S. Eicher, A. Imrohoroglu, E. Leeper, J. Oechssler and M. Pesendorfer
More articles in European Economic Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().