Investment shocks and consumption
Francesco Furlanetto () and
European Economic Review, 2014, vol. 66, issue C, 111-126
Several influential papers have argued that preferences featuring a weak wealth effect on labour supply are key to generate macroeconomic co-movement across real variables in response to shocks. Using a fully general specification for the instantaneous utility function, we show that the size of the wealth effect on labour supply is largely inconsequential for macroeconomic dynamics. Instead, we find that Edgeworth complementarity between consumption and hours worked is crucial in order to obtain co-movement of key macroeconomic variables. We consider investment shocks and we show that co-movement can easily be achieved with non-separable preferences in combination with a reasonable degree of nominal rigidity. This holds even in the presence of sizeable wealth effects.
Keywords: Investment shocks; Wealth effect; Complementarity; GHH preferences; Co-movement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:111-126
Access Statistics for this article
European Economic Review is currently edited by T.S. Eicher, A. Imrohoroglu, E. Leeper, J. Oechssler and M. Pesendorfer
More articles in European Economic Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().