Global samaritans? Donor election cycles and the allocation of humanitarian aid
Kurt Annen and
European Economic Review, 2017, vol. 96, issue C, 38-47
This paper finds a large causal donor election cycle effect in humanitarian aid allocations: on average, humanitarian aid increases by 19% in the year before elections. Our identification strategy consists of focusing on donors with fixed election dates, making elections clearly exogenous. Furthermore, we find large interaction effects with natural and human disasters. This evidence is consistent with our theory that incumbent governments responding to humanitarian disasters can increase voter support for their party and insure against the political fall-out of not being seen as representatives of a country with global interests and influence. However, it is important to stress that despite our findings, human and natural disasters explain a substantially larger share of the overall variation in humanitarian aid observed in the data.
Keywords: Humanitarian aid; Election cycles; Aid allocation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F35 D72 H5 O19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Global Samaritans? Donor Election Cycles and the Allocation of Humanitarian Aid (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:96:y:2017:i:c:p:38-47
Access Statistics for this article
European Economic Review is currently edited by T.S. Eicher, A. Imrohoroglu, E. Leeper, J. Oechssler and M. Pesendorfer
More articles in European Economic Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().