A joint best–worst scaling and stated choice model considering observed and unobserved heterogeneity: An application to residential location choice

Camila Balbontin, J. de D. Ortúzar and Joffre Swait

Journal of choice modelling, 2015, vol. 16, issue C, 1-14

Abstract: Traditional stated choice (SC) experiments are the most widely used method for measuring individual preferences. Notwithstanding, the issue of differentiating between the impacts of the attributes per se vs. the impact of the attribute levels shown in the experiment has been something of a challenge for researchers. Recent studies suggest that Best–Worst scaling (B–W) experiments would allow for the possibility of making this discrimination. In this study we combine B–W data with more traditional SC data to model the choice of residential location; we also allow for observed and unobserved heterogeneity in the combined models. To the best of our knowledge, this type of data fusion has not been used before in this context. Our dataset is fairly unique and corresponds to a sample of individuals interested in acquiring a flat in the centre of Santiago, Chile, from whom both types of responses were elicited. In addition, we have available a larger independent validation sample that responded to a second SC exercise in the same location and time period. We found that the best-fit model corresponded to pooling the ‘best’ and SC responses (i.e., ignoring the ‘worst’ data), while accounting for systematic taste variations (observable heterogeneity) and allowing for a correct treatment of the pseudo-panel nature of the data through error components (unobserved heterogeneity). Our results imply that analysts could get valuable additional information to increase their understanding on individuals’ behaviour when considering the joint use of B–W Scaling and SC data incorporating heterogeneity.

Keywords: Best-worst scaling; Discrete choice modelling; Residential location; Attribute importance; Heterogeneity; Combined estimation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534515300312
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:16:y:2015:i:c:p:1-14

DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2015.09.002

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of choice modelling is currently edited by S. Hess and J.M. Rose

More articles in Journal of choice modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().