Economics at your fingertips  

A web survey application of real choice experiments

Ulf Liebe, Klaus Glenk, Marie von Meyer-Höfer and Achim Spiller

Journal of choice modelling, 2019, vol. 33, issue C

Abstract: This research note presents the first study to implement a real choice experiment in a web survey. In a case study on ethical food consumption, we find statistically significant lower willingness-to-pay values for the attributes “organic production” and “fair trade” in a choice experiment involving real payments compared to a choice experiment without real payments. This holds only true for respondents who are prepared to provide their personal details in order to deliver the product (83% of the sample), providing further evidence that lack of consequentiality can be an important source of validity problems. The implementation of a real choice experiment online proves useful and can form the baseline for future tests of the effectiveness of ex ante approaches such as cheap talk or honesty priming as well as consequentiality scripts in web-based choice experiments.

Keywords: Consequentiality; Ethical food consumption; Hypothetical bias; Validity; Stated preferences; Willingness to pay; JE: C92; D12; H41; Q5; Q13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2018.07.003

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of choice modelling is currently edited by S. Hess and J.M. Rose

More articles in Journal of choice modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

Page updated 2020-02-15
Handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:33:y:2019:i:c:s1755534517301276