Portfolio rebalancing model using multiple criteria

Jing-Rung Yu and Wen-Yi Lee

European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, vol. 209, issue 2, 166-175

Abstract: In order to achieve greater flexibility in portfolio selection, transaction cost, short selling and higher moments should be considered, and actual transactions should be reflected. In this paper, five portfolio rebalancing models, with consideration of transaction cost and consisting of some or all criteria, including risk, return, short selling, skewness, and kurtosis, are compared to determine the important design criteria for a portfolio model. Two examples are used to perform simulated transactions, and the results indicate that the investment strategy of 'buy and hold' does not produce better returns for all the portfolios in the first example, and the models with higher moments or adopting short selling strategy perform better while rebalancing in the second example.

Keywords: Portfolio; selection; Short; selling; Skewness; Kurtosis; Transaction; cost (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(10)00616-8
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ejores:v:209:y:2011:i:2:p:166-175

Access Statistics for this article

European Journal of Operational Research is currently edited by Roman Slowinski, Jesus Artalejo, Jean-Charles. Billaut, Robert Dyson and Lorenzo Peccati

More articles in European Journal of Operational Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().