Comparing simulation models for market risk stress testing

Sanjay Basu

European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, vol. 213, issue 1, 329-339

Abstract: The subprime crisis has reminded us that effective stress tests should not only combine subjective scenarios with historical data, but also be probabilistic. In this paper, we combine three hypothetical shocks, of varying degrees, with more than six years of daily data on USD-INR and Euro-INR. Our objective is to compare six simulation-based stress models for foreign exchange positions. We find that while volatility-weighted historical simulation is the best model for volatility persistence, jump diffusion based Monte Carlo simulation is better at capturing correlation breakdown. Loss estimates from very fat-tailed distributions are not sensitive to the severity of stress scenarios.

Keywords: Risk; management; Volatility; updation; Tail; diversification; Simulation; models; Fat-tailed; distributions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(11)00178-0
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ejores:v:213:y:2011:i:1:p:329-339

Access Statistics for this article

European Journal of Operational Research is currently edited by Roman Slowinski, Jesus Artalejo, Jean-Charles. Billaut, Robert Dyson and Lorenzo Peccati

More articles in European Journal of Operational Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().