EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Stochastic dominance based comparison for system selection

D. Batur and F. Choobineh

European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, vol. 220, issue 3, 661-672

Abstract: We present two complementing selection procedures for comparing simulated systems based on the stochastic dominance relationship of a performance metric of interest. The decision maker specifies an output quantile set representing a section of the distribution of the metric, e.g., downside or upside risks or central tendencies, as the basis for comparison. The first procedure compares systems over the quantile set of interest by a first-order stochastic dominance criterion. The systems that are deemed nondominant in the first procedure could be compared by a weaker almost first-order stochastic dominance criterion in the second procedure. Numerical examples illustrate the capabilities of the proposed procedures.

Keywords: Simulation; System selection; Risk; First-order stochastic dominance; Almost first-order stochastic dominance; Quantile (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722171200135X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ejores:v:220:y:2012:i:3:p:661-672

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.018

Access Statistics for this article

European Journal of Operational Research is currently edited by Roman Slowinski, Jesus Artalejo, Jean-Charles. Billaut, Robert Dyson and Lorenzo Peccati

More articles in European Journal of Operational Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:220:y:2012:i:3:p:661-672