EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Bargaining model of labor disputes considering social mediation and bounded rationalityAuthor-Name: Liu, Dehai

Wei Lv, Hongyi Li () and Jiafu Tang

European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, vol. 262, issue 3, 1064-1071

Abstract: Due to the characteristics of bounded rationality for labor dispute mass emergencies in China, the Perles−Maschler (M−P) solution is applied to analyze the bargaining process between the employer and the employees. Considering that social mediation is a treatment method for labor dispute mass emergencies with Chinese characteristics, this paper compares the Nash solution for social mediation, the Kalai−Smorodinsky (K−S) solution for rational bargaining based on bargaining power, and the M−P solution for bounded rationality search. The results show that the final outcome for labor disputes not only depends on the different treatment models but also has the feature of “path dependence”. The Nash solution for social mediation can reach an outcome that benefits both the employees and the employer. By taking advantage of the social mediation in labor−capital conflicts and building a three-party mechanism for labor unions to take part in the negotiation, we can obtain a win−win outcome that can maintain both the employees’ benefits and rights, and the employer's productivity as well.

Keywords: OR in developing countries; Labor dispute mass emergency; Social mediation; Bounded rationality; M−P solution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717303363
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ejores:v:262:y:2017:i:3:p:1064-1071

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.003

Access Statistics for this article

European Journal of Operational Research is currently edited by Roman Slowinski, Jesus Artalejo, Jean-Charles. Billaut, Robert Dyson and Lorenzo Peccati

More articles in European Journal of Operational Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:262:y:2017:i:3:p:1064-1071