On the approximation ratio of the Random Chinese Postman Tour for network search
European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, vol. 263, issue 3, 782-788
We consider a classic search problem first proposed by Gal in which a Searcher randomizes between unit speed paths on a network, aiming to find a hidden point in minimal expected time in the worst case. This can be viewed as a zero-sum game between the Searcher and a time maximizing Hider. It is a natural model for many search problems such as search and rescue operations; the search for an enemy, a bomb or weapons in a military context; or predator–prey search. A Chinese Postman Tour (CPT) is a minimal time tour of the network that searches all the arcs and a Random Chinese Postman Tour (RCPT) is an equiprobable choice of any given CPT and its reverse. The full class of networks for which a RCPT is optimal is known, but otherwise little is known about the solution of the game except in some special cases that have complicated optimal strategies that would be impractical to implement. The question of how well a RCPT or any other search strategy performs for general networks has never been analyzed. We show that a RCPT has an approximation ratio of 4/3: that is, the maximum expected time it takes to find a point on the network is no greater than 4/3 times that of the optimal search strategy. We then examine the performance of a RCPT in a related search game recently proposed by Alpern in which the Searcher must return to his starting point after finding the Hider.
Keywords: Game theory; Search games; Chinese Postman Tour; Networks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ejores:v:263:y:2017:i:3:p:782-788
Access Statistics for this article
European Journal of Operational Research is currently edited by Roman Slowinski, Jesus Artalejo, Jean-Charles. Billaut, Robert Dyson and Lorenzo Peccati
More articles in European Journal of Operational Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().