Comparison of the multicriteria decision-making methods for equity portfolio selection: The U.S. evidence
Pasi Luukka and
Julian S Yeomans
European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, vol. 265, issue 2, 655-672
This paper compares the efficacy of four multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods in identifying the future best-performing stocks in two comprehensive samples of U.S. stocks. This is the first time that median-scaling (MS), the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and the additive Data Envelopment Analysis (add.DEA) have been used to combine value and momentum indicators into a single efficiency score. The results show that the MCDM methods examined can successfully be applied to equity portfolio selection. As a robustness check, we repeat all the main sample tests for the sample of the largest-cap stocks included in the two biggest size quintiles (i.e., stocks above 40% NYSE market-cap breakpoint) and find that the overall results are surprisingly robust to size effect. However, the best-performing portfolios formed on the basis of different MCDM methods have remarkably different exposures to the style factors that are commonly used to explain the abnormal returns of active equity portfolios. As a practical implication of this study, investors following certain investing styles could take these different style exposures into account when choosing the MCDM criteria that best fit their portfolio-selection purposes.
Keywords: Anomalies; Value investing; Momentum; Multicriteria decision-making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ejores:v:265:y:2018:i:2:p:655-672
Access Statistics for this article
European Journal of Operational Research is currently edited by Roman Slowinski, Jesus Artalejo, Jean-Charles. Billaut, Robert Dyson and Lorenzo Peccati
More articles in European Journal of Operational Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().