Composite indicators as generalized benefit-of-the-doubt weighted averages
European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, vol. 267, issue 1, 381-392
Composite indicators (CIs) are usually computed as arithmetic (weighted) averages of (often normalized) sub-indicators. Several studies criticized this procedure for implying requirements and properties that are often hard to maintain in practical applications. Recent studies explored the multiplicative aggregation and more specifically the geometric (weighted) average as aggregator in CI-building. This paper takes this exploration one step further by considering other members of the family of generalized (weighted) averages as aggregator in the construction of CIs. It is argued that the choice for a particular version of the generalized weighted average enables to reflect decision makers’ attitudes in the evaluation. For the Human Development Index, results show that the choice for a specific version of the generalized (weighted) average as aggregator in CI-construction impacts country rankings.
Keywords: Data Envelopment Analysis; Benefit-of-the-doubt model; Composite indicator; Generalized mean aggregation; Human Development Index (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ejores:v:267:y:2018:i:1:p:381-392
Access Statistics for this article
European Journal of Operational Research is currently edited by Roman Slowinski, Jesus Artalejo, Jean-Charles. Billaut, Robert Dyson and Lorenzo Peccati
More articles in European Journal of Operational Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().