Evaluating the dynamic performance of energy portfolios: Empirical evidence from the DEA directional distance function
Yue-Jun Zhang () and
Ming-Ying Chen
European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, vol. 269, issue 1, 64-78
Abstract:
In recent years, the complex global energy commodity market has led to increased uncertainty for energy investment returns and tremendous challenges for investors to design appropriate energy portfolios. Therefore, we employ four popular portfolio methods to determine energy portfolios based on daily fossil-fuel futures prices during 2006-2015. Moreover, we use the DEA window analysis method and DEA directional distance function to comprehensively evaluate the dynamic performance of these energy portfolios, based on the efficiency perspective. The empirical results indicate that, first, to increase investment returns, the mean-variance method that exclusively emphasizes the maximization of returns shows the best performance; however, in order to decrease the volatility and risk of investment returns, the mean-variance method that aims to resist risk more than make profits and the bootstrap-historical simulation Value-at-Risk (VaR) method have the best performance. Second, when the global financial crisis broke out in the second half of 2008 and energy markets experienced a sharp downturn in the second half of 2014, the DEA efficiency of energy portfolios appeared relatively lower than those of their neighboring periods, regardless of which portfolio method is employed. Finally, the average DEA efficiencies of energy portfolios are all higher than those of single-energy investment throughout the sample period, except when the equally weighted method and the information entropy-comprehensive index method are used; meanwhile, the mean-variance method that prefers profit-making to risk-resisting possesses the highest average DEA efficiency among various methods concerned.
Keywords: OR in energy; Energy investment performance; Portfolio methods; DEA directional distance function; DEA window analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (27)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717307208
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ejores:v:269:y:2018:i:1:p:64-78
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.008
Access Statistics for this article
European Journal of Operational Research is currently edited by Roman Slowinski, Jesus Artalejo, Jean-Charles. Billaut, Robert Dyson and Lorenzo Peccati
More articles in European Journal of Operational Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().