Analysis of flow shop scheduling anomalies

S.S. Panwalkar and Christos Koulamas

European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, vol. 280, issue 1, 25-33

Abstract: Anomalies in flow shop scheduling are rare; only two anomalies have been reported. We present five new anomalies for the permutation flow shop models with the minimum makespan objective and seven more anomalies for the minimum total flow time objective. These anomalies (including the existing ones) are divided into three types corresponding to an increased processing time of a single operation, the addition of a job and the addition of a machine. We derive two properties which, when satisfied, eliminate the possibility of certain anomalies. We conclude that restrictions such as no-delay schedules, no job waiting or no machine idle time (after it starts processing) often result in anomalies. We also show that anomalies can also occur in non-permutation flow shops (four new anomalies presented).

Keywords: Scheduling; Flow shop; Anomaly; Paradox (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221719305363
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ejores:v:280:y:2020:i:1:p:25-33

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.043

Access Statistics for this article

European Journal of Operational Research is currently edited by Roman Slowinski, Jesus Artalejo, Jean-Charles. Billaut, Robert Dyson and Lorenzo Peccati

More articles in European Journal of Operational Research from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().