Socioeconomic costs of replacing nuclear power with fossil and renewable energy in Taiwan

Yi-Hsuan Shih, Nian-Xun Shi, Chao-Heng Tseng, Shu-Yuan Pan and Pen-Chi Chiang

Energy, 2016, vol. 114, issue C, 369-381

Abstract: Economic analysis is essential for developing sustainable energy, especially low-carbon nuclear and renewable energy. Therefore, this study attempted to provide a comprehensive evaluation on the social costs of nuclear, coal, gas, solar photovoltaic and wind energy in life cycle aspect, and compared these results with the European and Japanese estimates for verification. The atmospheric dispersion simulation results show that a cumulative effective dose of radionuclides equal to the radionuclides released during the first 19 days of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster would exceed the regulatory limit of 1 mSv/year for part of the residents living near the sites. The results of meta-analysis of life cycle social costs show nuclear power has the lowest private costs among all energy. Regarding external costs, only wind energy is competitive with nuclear in most cases. Moreover, replacing Nuke No.1–3 with coal and gas would cause an estimated 460 and 255 premature deaths annually, respectively, totaling 715 life losses per year in Taiwan. In sum, with decreasing land carrying capacity by population growth, the environmental and social-economic feasibility of energy development need further assessment with respect to the international protocols for sustainable development goals and climate change mitigation targets.

Keywords: Socioeconomic costs; Nuclear power; Renewable energy; Atmospheric dispersion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216310428
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:114:y:2016:i:c:p:369-381

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.118

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().