Energy auditing of a maize–wheat–greengram cropping system under conventional and conservation agriculture in irrigated north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains

A.A. Saad, T.K. Das, D.S. Rana, A.R. Sharma, Ranjan Bhattacharyya and Krishan Lal

Energy, 2016, vol. 116, issue P1, 293-305

Abstract: This study evaluated energy requirements and input-output energy relationship in a maize-wheat-greengram cropping system under conventional and conservation agriculture. Conventional tillage with flat bed (CTF) and raised bed (CTB) and zero tillage with flat bed (ZTF) and raised bed (ZTB) were supplemented with crop residue management viz., no residue (CON), wheat residue in maize crop (WR), maize residue in wheat crop (MR) and wheat + maize residue in both maize & wheat crops (WMR). Results showed that ZTB (89170 MJ/ha) consumed 8% lower input energy than CTF. ZTB saved 91% and 38% energy in land preparation and irrigation, respectively. The output and net energy return were significantly higher with ZTF (387235 MJ/ha; 295397 MJ/ha), which were 2.0% higher than ZTB. Energy ratio and productivity were significantly higher with ZTB. WMR contributed the highest input and output energy and lowered energy ratio and productivity. Reduced energy ratio and energy productivity can be ignored as it returned to soil to improve its quality. Surface retained residues had better effect on crop productivity. With this view, ZTB with WMR was better and would be a substitute of the conventional agricultural system for adoption in maize-wheat-greengram cropping system in the irrigated north western Indo-Gangetic Plains.

Keywords: Conservation agriculture; Crop establishment; Residue management; Energy; Productivity; Maize–wheat–greengram cropping system (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216313871
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:116:y:2016:i:p1:p:293-305

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.115

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().