EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Co-firing sludge in a pulverized coal-fired utility boiler: Combustion characteristics and economic impacts

Peng Tan, Lun Ma, Ji Xia, Qingyan Fang, Cheng Zhang and Gang Chen

Energy, 2017, vol. 119, issue C, 392-399

Abstract: Co-incineration of sludge in the existing coal-fired utility boilers is a promising sludge disposal approach, but study on the combustion characteristics and the economic impacts of co-firing sludge in full-scale utility boilers is in absence. In this study, a series of full-scale field experiments and numerical experiments were conducted to study the coal-sludge co-combustion characteristic in a 100 MW coal-fired utility boiler. The effects of sludge blending ratio and moisture content in sludge are concerned. Subsequently, the economic impacts of co-firing sludge is presented. The results demonstrate that the combustion characteristics is acceptable when co-firing 10% sludge. The ignition property and the flame stability are significantly affected when the mass content of co-fired sludge is over 10%. Decreasing the moisture content in sludge is beneficial to the combustion characteristics but the improvements are limited. Co-firing sludge is profitable for power plants as the savings from coal and sludge disposal allowance is quite substantial. Considering both the combustion characteristics and the economic impacts, co-firing 10% sludge with moisture content ranging from 40% to 56% is optimal. The annual profit from co-firing sludge can reach 4.2 million to 5.5 million Chinese yuan (CNY), which is remarkable for the power plant.

Keywords: Sludge; Co-combustion; Combustion characteristic; Economic impacts; Coal-fired boiler (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054421631862X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:119:y:2017:i:c:p:392-399

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.084

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:119:y:2017:i:c:p:392-399