Structured, physically inspired (gray box) models versus black box modeling for forecasting the output power of photovoltaic plants

Marius Paulescu, Marek Brabec, Remus Boata and Viorel Badescu

Energy, 2017, vol. 121, issue C, 792-802

Abstract: Two advanced models for forecasting the output power of photovoltaic plants are discussed in details: a black-box Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model and a physically inspired, semiparametric statistical model (Generalized Additive Model, GAM) based on smoothing splines. The structure of the two models, their strengths and weaknesses, are presented. The models performance is thoroughly compared with the performance of a simple linear model tested under the frame of the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action “Weather Intelligence for Renewable Energies”, as a benchmark used also in the forecasting exercise reported in Sperati et al. Energies 8 (2015) 9594. The models are used to forecasting the output power at time horizons of 1–72 h ahead. The data used during the COST competition are used here as input. The present study extends beyond the traditional evaluation of overall model accuracy. Detailed influences of seasonal effects, sun elevation angle and solar irradiance level upon the models performance are assessed. While the accuracy of the simple linear model is not entirely bad, it differs in important details from the two advanced forecasting models. The results show that a moderate, carefully chosen increase in model structure complexity can improve the predictive performance. Suitable penalty on model complexity can help both to enforce parsimony and improve practical forecasting abilities, to a certain extent. The physically inspired GAM comes out as the best performing model.

Keywords: Photovoltaic plant; Output power; Forecasting; Fuzzy model; Generalized additive model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217300154
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:121:y:2017:i:c:p:792-802

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.015

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().