Mercury emission control: Phase II. Let’s now go passive

Keith Schofield

Energy, 2017, vol. 122, issue C, 311-318

Abstract: The US Environmental Protection Agency’s plan for a National set of standards limiting mercury emission from coal power plants has recently hit a setback. A decision by the US Supreme Court rejected this based on the two available methods having a burdensome cost basis. Moreover, even if the activated charcoal or bromine addition methods do become standard in the US, their cost may still inhibit global implementation. As a result it is timely to develop alternate methods. This paper outlines further development of such an approach. It is based on mercury’s own chemistry. Previous published work discovered that elemental mercury, although volatile, has a propensity for heterogeneous chemistry on warm non-catalytic surfaces. This paper now reports results of a second pilot plant test continuing its clarification, extension and further validation of practicality. It extends data to inexpensive base metal surfaces that can be used and indicates the extent of mercury control possible. This non-catalytic heterogeneous chemistry has been overlooked due to this disguising role of surfaces. It is this that now suggests a passive mitigation method, natural to the system. By providing inserted metal surfaces in the downstream flue gas flow, mercury can be chemically modified and controlled.

Keywords: Mercury control; Coal combustion; Surface chemistry; Pilot plant testing; Non-catalytic; Passive method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217300889
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:122:y:2017:i:c:p:311-318

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.088

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().