Emergy analysis of three alternative carbon dioxide capture processes

Prathana Nimmanterdwong, Benjapon Chalermsinsuwan and Pornpote Piumsomboon

Energy, 2017, vol. 128, issue C, 101-108

Abstract: Carbon dioxide (CO2) capture technologies have increased in importance recently due to high CO2 emission levels, principally from fossil fuel power generation to support increasing global energy demand. In this study, emergy accounting was applied to quantify the utilization of resources and compare process performance, in terms of sustainability, of three alternative CO2 capture technologies (chemical absorption, solid adsorption and membrane separation) selected from the representative literature. The natural investment or unit emergy value (UEV) of each process was evaluated in units of sej/kg. The results revealed that the lowest to highest UEVs were solid adsorption, membrane separation and amine absorption, respectively. Thus, the most preferable choice for CO2 capture among these three approaches was solid-based adsorption, since it consumed the lowest level of natural resources. Moreover, the UEV of the solid-based adsorption process can be lowered by improving and optimizing the heat utilization within the system and replacing the non-renewable sources of heat and power with renewable resources. In addition, the emergy analysis also provided suggestions for improving membrane separation and amine absorption processes. For amine absorption, improving solvent regeneration efficiency would reduce natural gas consumption, while for membrane separation, power sources should be switched to renewable resources.

Keywords: CO2 capture; Emergy; Amine absorption; Solid adsorption; Membrane separation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217305480
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:128:y:2017:i:c:p:101-108

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.154

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().