EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparison between Fanger's thermal comfort model and human exergy loss

Matjaž Prek and Vincenc Butala

Energy, 2017, vol. 138, issue C, 228-237

Abstract: Numerous metrics and indices have been proposed for the assessment of thermal perception and comfort. Commonly used indices based on the estimate of the heat flow between the human and its environment includes the well-known Fanger's method, also known as the PMV-PPD thermal comfort model. Recently this thermodynamic approach has been expanded with the application of the second law of thermodynamics. In this paper, an exergy-based analysis of the relation between the human and its environment is presented. Heat and mass flow rate due to convection, radiation, evaporation and respiration are calculated and expressed in terms of exergy loss. This value is used in the modified Fanger's thermal comfort model, where the heat balance equation is replaced by the exergy loss. The paper builds upon prior studies on determination of internal and external exergy losses by revised and newly defined formulas taking into account clothing and indoor conditions. The results quantitatively show that thermal energy load in the original Fanger's PMV model could be substituted by exergy loss and it corresponds to a certain level of subjective assessed thermal comfort level.

Keywords: Heat transfer; Mass transfer; Exergy loss; Exergy analysis; Thermal comfort; Indoor environment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217312203
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:138:y:2017:i:c:p:228-237

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.045

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:138:y:2017:i:c:p:228-237