Predicting conservation choice: Beyond the cost-minimization assumption

Paul S. Komor and Lyna L. Wiggins

Energy, 1988, vol. 13, issue 8, 633-645

Abstract: Models of residential energy conservation choice typically require the assumption that consumers make conservation choices so as to minimize life-cycle costs. Empirical evidence has shown discount rates to vary widely, which has cast doubt on the cost-minimization assumption. We propose an alternative model of conservation choice that does not assume minimized life-cycle costs, and that accounts for non-financial factors influencing choice. Perceived comfort effects, social norm influences, perceived costs and savings, and time required for installation are identified as causal influences on conservation choice, and these factors are measured using a household survey. The resulting model is shown to predict conservation choice correctly in 74.7% of the households. A new statistical technique (CART) is used to show that perceived savings have little predictive power.

Date: 1988
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0360544288900941
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:13:y:1988:i:8:p:633-645

DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(88)90094-1

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().