Comparative scaling analysis of two different sized pilot-scale fluidized bed reactors operating with biomass substrates

J. Cardoso, V. Silva, D. Eusébio, P. Brito, M.J. Hall and L. Tarelho
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Victor Hugo de Oliveira Silva

Energy, 2018, vol. 151, issue C, 520-535

Abstract: This paper presents a comparative scaling analysis of two different sized pilot-scale fluidized bed reactors operating with biomass substrates. A multiphase Eulerian-Eulerian 2-D mathematical model was implemented, coupled with in-house user-defined functions (UDF) built to enhance hydrodynamics and heat transfer phenomena. The model validation was attained by comparison to experimental data gathered from both reactors. A grid refinement study was carried out for both geometries to achieve an appropriate computational domain. Hydrodynamics was deeply studied for both reactors concerning the scale-up effect. Mixing and segregation phenomena, solid particle distribution and biomass velocity were matters of great concern. Results showed that UDF implementation successfully minimized deviations and increased the model’s predictability. The largest deviations measured between experimental and numerical results for syngas composition were of about 20%. Solids mixing and segregation was found to be directly affected by the particles size, density, and superficial gas velocity, with the larger reactor revealing improved mixing ability. Improved mixing occurred for smaller particles size ratio (dbiomass = 3 mm), smaller particles density ratio (ρbiomass = 950 kg/m3), and higher dimensionless superficial gas velocities (U0/Umf=3.5). The larger unit showed an increase in near-wall velocity, lateral dispersion, and bubble size. As for the smaller reactor, higher velocities were obtained at the center region due to a more pronounced wall boundary layer. Similarities were found between the two reactors regarding the bubble distribution, dimensionless average bed pressure drop and biomass velocity vector profiles when dimensionless parameters were employed.

Keywords: Hydrodynamics; Scale-up; Pilot-scale bubbling fluidized bed gasifier; Biomass gasification; Mixing and segregation index; ANSYS FLUENT (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218304997
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:151:y:2018:i:c:p:520-535

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.090

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().