Comparative techno-economic assessment and environmental impacts of rice husk-to-fuel conversion technologies
Pornkamol Unrean,
Bridgid Chin Lai Fui,
Elisabeth Rianawati and
Menandro Acda
Energy, 2018, vol. 151, issue C, 581-593
Abstract:
This study compared techno-economic performances and environmental impacts of different technologies for rice husk-to-fuel biorefinery – hydrothermal carbonization with pelletization (HTC), pyrolysis (PYR) and anaerobic co-digestion (AD) process – and benchmarked against a conventional direct combustion (DC) for combined heat and power. Economic analysis through techno-economic (TE) model showed HTC with the greatest potentials compared to other processes due to its high-solid operating capacity and could be cost-competitive against the DC technology. Analysis results also highlighted a need for improvement of PYR and AD process in term of the increase of solid loading operation and the exploration of process wastes for better economic benefits and cost competitiveness. Based on life-cycle analysis (LCA) model, HTC yielded the lowest carbon and water footprints from amongst the analyzed options. Nevertheless, all three options had lower GHG emissions and water utilizations than DC process, indicating better environmentally advantageous of these processes. The LCA of three conversion technologies showed better environmental performances mainly lower global warming potential, lower photochemical oxidation potential and lower acidification potential than the DC reference system. The results obtained from this work could be exploited by decision makers for selecting appropriated biomass-to-fuel process based on environmental and economic performances.
Keywords: Biorefinery; Rice husk-to-fuel processing; Techno-economic assessment; Life cycle analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218305218
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:151:y:2018:i:c:p:581-593
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.112
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().