EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Experimental validation of an air-PCM storage unit comparing the effective heat capacity and enthalpy methods through CFD simulations

Muriel Iten, Shuli Liu and Ashish Shukla

Energy, 2018, vol. 155, issue C, 495-503

Abstract: Two computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models were developed for the simulation of an air- thermal energy storage (TES) unit. The TES unit was experimentally tested with air flowing over horizontal metallic panels filled with phase change material (PCM). The commercial PCM was characterised by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), namely: phase change temperature range, specific heat and enthalpy values. These properties were coupled to the CFD models in order to setup the two most common methods for phase change problems: enthalpy and the effective heat capacity methods. Both models predicted the PCM temperature and air outlet temperature and were compared with the experimental results. The PCM temperature presented the major differences. The enthalpy method shows the phase change stage by a quasi-horizontal curve, appropriate for pure PCMs. However, most of the commercial PCMs are composed by different compounds and hence this is not linear during the phase change as presented by the experimental results. The smooth increase over the phase change was accurately predicted by the effective heat capacity method. For the air outlet temperature, both methods present good agreements with the experimental results. Hence, for analysis requiring particular attention on the PCM behaviour the effective heat capacity method is recommended.

Keywords: Phase change materials (PCM); DSC analysis; Enthalpy method and effective heat capacity method; CFD modelling; Computer validation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054421830745X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:155:y:2018:i:c:p:495-503

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.128

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:155:y:2018:i:c:p:495-503