AnMBR as alternative to conventional CSTR to achieve efficient methane production from thermal hydrolyzed sludge at short HRTs

Simon M. Wandera, Wei Qiao, Mengmeng Jiang, Dalal E. Gapani, Shaojie Bi and Renjie Dong

Energy, 2018, vol. 159, issue C, 588-598

Abstract: An anaerobic membrane reactor (AnMBR) was investigated and compared with a continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR) in order to treat thermal hydrolyzed sludge. Long term experiments were carried out by shortening the hydraulic retention time (HRT) from 30 d to 3 d under mesophilic conditions. The results obtained show that at each HRT the AnMBR had higher removal efficiencies for total solids and volatile solids, and higher specific methanogenic activities. Comparable process stability was obtained for the two reactors. A flat sheet membrane could work with the high solid system but the trans-membrane pressure appeared sensitive to total solid concentrations. Foaming occurred in the AnMBR at a HRT of 3 d, and an organic loading rate of 8.84 kg-COD/(m3·d) further deteriorated the membrane filtration. Hydrogentropic methanogens, in particular Methanospirillum, dominated the archaea community in both the AnMBR and the CSTR at a HRT of 3 d (i.e. 85% in the AnMBR and 95% in the CSTR). An obligate acetoclastic methanogen, Methanosaeta, was found at a very low level during all the HRTs. As a whole, the efficiency of methanogenesis in the AnMBR to treat thermal hydrolyzed sludge was proved to be better than in the CSTR during short HRTs.

Keywords: Anaerobic membrane reactor; Continuously stirred tank reactor; Hydraulic retention time; Thermal hydrolyzed sludge; Methane production (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218312660
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:159:y:2018:i:c:p:588-598

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.201

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().