Ultrasound intensify CO2 desorption from pressurized loaded monoethanolamine solutions. II. Optimization and cost estimation
Jiru Ying,
Dag A. Eimer,
Anette Mathisen,
Frode Brakstad and
Hans Aksel Haugen
Energy, 2019, vol. 173, issue C, 218-228
Abstract:
Optimization and cost estimation were performed for the use of ultrasound for intensifying CO2 reboiler stripping from lean monoethanolamine (MEA) aqueous solutions at 1.0 barg. This work was based on typical industrial reboiler operation conditions. Experiments were run by intermittently applying ultrasound for CO2 stripping. A multi-variable data analysis was employed to explain the results and find the optimum for ultrasound operation. The results show that the CO2 stripping rate by ultrasound is more than 3 times than heat only in the reboiler. A normalized specific energy consumption was defined based on the classic industrial case (4.2 kJ/kg CO2), and the normalized specific energy consumption 3.6 MJ/kg CO2 was deduced, showing 14% energy saving. Cost estimations have been conducted using Aspen Plus V9.0 and Aspen In-plant Cost Estimator for the industrial cases with/without the assistance of ultrasound. Total capture cost is 60.2 EUR/t CO2 and cost saving is 19% when the CO2 loading of the lean MEA solution can be further decreased to 0.20 mol/mol from 0.44 mol/mol assisted by ultrasound.
Keywords: Ultrasound; CO2 desorption; Loaded MEA aq. solution; Normalized specific energy consumption; Optimization; Cost estimation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219302658
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:173:y:2019:i:c:p:218-228
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.070
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().