Energy intensity and its differences across China’s regions: Combining econometric and decomposition analysis
Le Wen and
Energy, 2019, vol. 180, issue C, 989-1000
To achieve the energy intensity reduction targets set by the Chinese government policymakers need to understand the key drivers that contribute to regional variations in energy intensity. Understanding regional differences will contribute to the design of more effective energy policies. To facilitate this understanding we estimate a penalized panel quantile regression model that accounts for unobserved individual heterogeneity and distributional heterogeneity across the regions of China. The effects of economic growth, urbanization, foreign direct investment, energy structure, and industrialization, on energy intensity differ across quantiles. The effects of economic growth and foreign direct investment on energy intensity are negative and significant at every quantile. A 1% increase in foreign direct investment decreases energy intensity along the entire conditional distribution, ranging from 7.5% at 10th quantile to 3.7% at 90th quantile. The effects of urbanization and industrialization on energy intensity are positive and significant at every quantile. Moreover, a 1% increase in industrialization lifts energy intensity by 54% at 10th quantile and 33% per cent at 90th quantile. The results from a Shapley decomposition model further show that economic growth is the most prominent factor that contributes to energy intensity differences, following by industrialization, foreign direct investment and energy structure.
Keywords: Energy intensity; Energy intensity differences; Penalized panel quantile regression; Shapely decomposition; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:180:y:2019:i:c:p:989-1000
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().