EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A comparative life cycle analysis of wheat straw utilization modes in China

Guishi Cheng, Ying Zhao, Shijiu Pan, Xiaoqiang Wang and Changqing Dong

Energy, 2020, vol. 194, issue C

Abstract: There are abundant wheat straw resources in China. Proper treatment of wheat straw can reduce environmental pollution and environmental load while bring certain economic benefits. How to choose the right way to deal with straw is a difficult problem at present. Life cycle analysis of three wheat straw utilization modes: (1)direct combustion for electricity (2)fuel ethanol production and (3)feed production have been conducted to compare their environmental performances. Life cycle analysis results show that fuel ethanol production from wheat straw is an environment-friendly utilization mode because of its great advantages (−412mPt) in human health, ecological environment quality, climate change and natural resources. Direct combustion for electricity has certain advantages in terms of natural resources and treatment efficiency, but has greater impact (308mPt) on climate change and more emissions compared with fuel ethanol production and feed production. Feed production has great economic advantages and moderate environmental load (358mPt). It has the potential for large-scale application. The determination of the specific utilization mode should take into account the actual needs local conditions and other factors.

Keywords: Utilization mode; Direct combustion for electricity; Fuel ethanol production; Feed production; Wheat straw; Life cycle analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220300219
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220300219

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.116914

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220300219